J Neuromonit Neurophysiol > Volume 4(2); 2024 > Article
Ryu: Decoding taste perception: the role of electrophysiology in taste transduction mechanisms

Abstract

Taste perception is a vital sensory process that helps organisms distinguish nutrients from harmful substances. It converts chemical stimuli into electrical signals through receptors on taste receptor cells within taste buds. The five primary taste modalities—sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami—are mediated by distinct molecular mechanisms. G-protein-coupled receptors, such as T1R and T2R families, are responsible for sweet, umami, and bitter tastes, while ion channels like epithelial sodium channels and proton-sensitive channels govern salty and sour detection. Electrophysiological techniques like patch-clamp recordings, multi-electrode arrays, and voltage-sensitive imaging have provided insights into the electrical properties of taste cells, neurotransmitter release, and neural coding models. Recent advancements in optogenetics, microfluidic devices, and nanoelectrode arrays have refined our understanding of taste transduction at the cellular and network levels. This review highlights key findings in the electrophysiology of taste, focusing on progress in understanding peripheral and central taste processing. It also discusses emerging technologies and future directions that could further advance the field and address ongoing questions about taste perception.

Introduction

Taste perception is a critical sensory function that enables organisms to evaluate their environment, distinguish beneficial nutrients from harmful substances, and make dietary choices essential for survival. This process relies on taste transduction, which converts chemical stimuli into electrical signals that are processed and interpreted by the brain. At the cellular level, taste transduction involves the interaction of tastants with specialized receptors on taste receptor cells located within taste buds. This interaction activates signaling cascades, leading to neurotransmitter release and the generation of electrical activity. Electrophysiology has emerged as a cornerstone technique for understanding these mechanisms, providing precise measurements of the electrical properties of taste receptor cells and neural circuits.
Taste buds, the primary sensory organs of the gustatory system, are distributed across the tongue, soft palate, and pharynx. Each taste bud comprises multiple taste receptor cells, which are categorized into three main types: Type I cells that support ionic and neurotransmitter homeostasis, Type II cells that detect sweet, bitter, and umami tastes via G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and Type III cells that detect sour taste through proton-sensitive ion channels. Salty taste is mediated by epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs), which directly depolarize the membrane in response to sodium ions [1,2].
The transduction mechanisms for the five primary taste modalities sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami are distinct. Sweet and umami tastants activate heter — - odimeric GPCRs (T1R2/T1R3 for sweet; T1R1/T1R3 for umami) that initiate intracellular signaling cascades involving molecules such as inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Bitter tastants activate T2R receptors, which are highly sensitive to toxic compounds, providing an evolutionary advantage by alerting organisms to harmful substances. Sour taste is transduced by acid-sensing ion channels, such as otopetrin 1 (OTOP1), while salty taste relies on the direct influx of sodium ions through Epithelial Na+ channels [3,4]. Electrophysiological methods have been indispensable in elucidating the cellular and molecular basis of these transduction mechanisms. Patch-clamp techniques have allowed researchers to measure ion channel activity, revealing the electrical changes that occur in response to tastnts. Extracellular recordings, which measure action potentials in gustatory nerves, have provided insights into how taste signals are encoded and transmitted to the brainstem, helping to distinguish between competing models of taste coding, such as the labeled-line and across-fiber pattern models [5].
The broader implications of these studies extend to understanding taste-related disorders, such as ageusia (loss of taste) and dysgeusia (altered taste perception), and designing interventions to modulate taste perception. Moreover, taste research serves as a model system for studying sensory processing, offering insights into general principles of how chemical signals are detected, encoded, and integrated within the brain.
By combining molecular biology and electrophysiology, significant progress has been made in decoding how taste perception occurs at the cellular and molecular levels. From characterizing the roles of specific receptors and ion channels to elucidating the neural circuits underlying taste perception, electrophysiology remains a vital tool in unraveling the complexities of taste transduction. Therefore, this paper intends to review the field of taste signaling and electrophysiological research.

Mechanisms of Taste Transduction

The transduction of taste stimuli into electrical signals is a complex process that involves various cellular receptors and signaling pathways, each tuned to detect one of the primary taste modalities: sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami. Upon binding to taste molecules, receptors on the surface of taste cells initiate signaling cascades that culminate in the release of neurotransmitters. These signals are then relayed to the brain, where they are interpreted as distinct taste sensations [6,7]. Each taste modality relies on different molecular mechanisms, primarily involving GPCRs for sweet, bitter, and umami tastes, and ion channels for salty and sour tastes (Figure 1).

G-Protein-Coupled Receptors for Sweet, Umami, and Bitter Tastes

Sweet, umami, and bitter tastes are mediated by GPCRs, a large class of receptors that detect extracellular molecules and activate intracellular signaling pathways. Sweet and umami tastes are primarily mediated by the T1R family of receptors, while bitter taste is mediated by the T2R family.
• Sweet and Umami: Sweet taste receptors consist of a heterodimer of T1R2 and T1R3 subunits, while umami taste perception involves a T1R1 and T1R3 heterodimer. When a sweet or umami ligand binds to these receptors, it triggers the activation of a G-protein called gustducin. This, in turn, activates phospholipase C (PLC) and leads to the production of IP3, which releases calcium ions (Ca²⁺) from intracellular stores. The rise in Ca²⁺ concentration depolarizes the taste cell, facilitating neurotransmitter release and signaling to the brain [8,9].
• Bitter: Bitter taste detection is more complex due to the structural diversity of bitter compounds. The T2R receptor family consists of multiple receptors, each able to recognize different bitter molecules. When bitter compounds bind to T2Rs, they activate gustducin, similar to sweet and umami pathways, leading to PLC activation, IP3 production, and calcium release, which depolarizes the cell and transmits a bitter signal [1,10].

Ion Channels for Salty and Sour Tastes

Unlike sweet, bitter, and umami, salty and sour tastes rely on ion channels rather than GPCRs for signal transduction.
• Salty: Salt taste perception is primarily mediated by ENaCs, which allow sodium ions (Na⁺) to enter taste cells. This influx of Na⁺ depolarizes the taste cell, leading to an action potential that signals the brain to perceive a salty taste. High concentrations of Na⁺ can also activate non-ENaC sodium channels, although the specific mechanisms remain under investigation [7,11].
• Sour: Sour taste detection is primarily driven by the presence of hydrogen ions (H⁺) from acidic substances. The exact molecular mechanism is still a topic of research, but certain ion channels, such as polycystic kidney disease 2-like 1 (PKD2L1) and OTOP1, are believed to play a role in sensing sour taste. When H⁺ ions enter the cell, they depolarize it and generate a sour taste signal, protecting organisms from potentially harmful acidic substances [12].

Secondary Messengers and Intracellular Signaling Pathways

For GPCR-mediated tastes (sweet, bitter, umami), the production of IP3 and the resulting release of Ca²⁺ are crucial steps in signal transduction. Additionally, cMAP is involved in modulating taste sensitivity. These secondary messengers coordinate cellular responses by amplifying the taste signal and ensuring effective neurotransmitter release [6,13].

Integration of Taste Signals

Once the taste cells are activated, the signals converge at the gustatory nucleus in the brainstem and are then relayed to higher brain centers for further processing and perception. Electrophysiological studies indicate that taste cells can exhibit cross-modal interactions, meaning that some cells respond to more than one taste quality, which contributes to the complexity of taste perception and flavor [14].

Electrophysiology of Taste Cells

Electrophysiology provides a powerful approach to studying the electrical properties of taste cells and their role in signal transduction. By measuring ion currents, membrane potentials, and synaptic activity, researchers have elucidated key mechanisms underlying taste perception. This section explores electrophysiological techniques (Figure 2), their applications in taste research, and the critical findings that have advanced our understanding of how taste cells process and transmit signals.

Electrophysiological Techniques in Taste Research

Patch-Clamp Recording

Patch-clamp techniques are widely used to study ion channel activity and membrane potentials in isolated taste cells. By applying glass micropipettes to the cell membrane, researchers can record ionic currents in various configurations (whole-cell, single-channel, or perforated patch). This method has revealed the properties of voltage-gated and ligand-gated in taste cells [15,16].
For instance, studies using patch-clamp have identified the role of transient receptor potential channels in sour and bitter taste responses, as well as the function of ENaCs in salty taste transduction [7].

Electrochemical and Voltage-Sensitive Dye Techniques

In addition to patch-clamp recording, voltage-sensitive dyes and fluorescent calcium indicators are used to measure changes in membrane potential or intracellular calcium levels. These methods enable high-throughput analyses of taste cell responses to stimuli, providing insights into the dynamics of signal transduction. For example, calcium imaging has demonstrated the temporal and spatial patterns of intracellular signaling in response to sweet and umami stimuli [17].

Multi-Electrode Arrays

Multi-electrode arrays (MEA) recordings allow for simultaneous monitoring of extracellular electrical activity from multiple taste cells or nerve fibers. This technique has been particularly useful in studying the integration of signals within the taste bud and at the level of the gustatory nerves [18]. MEAs have contributed to understanding how different taste modalities are encoded and transmitted to the brain.

Findings in the Electrophysiology of Taste Cells

Voltage-Gated Ion Channels

Taste cells exhibit various voltage-gated ion channels, including sodium, potassium, and calcium channels, which are essential for generating action potentials and neurotransmitter release. Patch-clamp studies have revealed that bitter and sour taste transduction relies on depolarization mediated by specific ion channels, such as PKD2L1 for sour taste [9].

Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Salty and sour tastes are closely linked to ion channels that are directly activated by specific stimuli. ENaCs mediate salty taste by allowing Na⁺ influx, while proton-sensitive channels, such as OTOP1, are critical for sour taste perception. Electrophysiological experiments have shown that the activation of these channels leads to membrane depolarization and subsequent neurotransmitter release [13].

Neurotransmitter Release and Synaptic Activity

Electrophysiological recordings have illuminated the mechanisms of synaptic transmission in taste cells. Taste cells release neurotransmitters, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and serotonin, to activate gustatory nerves. ATP is released through pannexin hemichannels and is essential for sweet, bitter, and umami signal transmission [19]. Sour, on the other hand, modulates taste sensitivity by acting on presynaptic and postsynaptic cells within the taste bud [20].

Temporal Dynamics of Taste Responses

Electrophysiological studies have revealed that taste cell responses vary in their temporal profiles, with some cells showing rapid activation and adaptation while others maintain sustained responses. This diversity in response kinetics is thought to contribute to the encoding of taste quality and intensity [14].

Role of Electrophysiology in Decoding Taste Perception

Electrophysiology has demonstrated that taste cells often exhibit overlapping sensitivity to multiple modalities, challenging the traditional “labeled-line” model of taste coding. Instead, taste perception may involve a combinatorial coding strategy, where the collective activity of multiple cell types encodes specific taste qualities. Electrophysiological recordings from gustatory nerves support this model, showing that individual nerve fibers respond to multiple tastes with varying degrees of sensitivity [21].
Moreover, advancements in electrophysiological techniques, such as optogenetics, have enabled precise manipulation of specific taste cell populations, further elucidating their roles in taste signaling and perception [22].

Role of Electrophysiology in Decoding Taste Perception

Electrophysiological studies have been instrumental in unraveling the complex mechanisms underlying taste perception. By enabling direct measurement of the electrical activity of taste cells, gustatory nerves, and central neurons, these studies have provided insights into how taste stimuli are encoded at the peripheral and central levels of the gustatory system. This section discusses the key findings from electrophysiological research, focusing on how these studies have shaped our understanding of taste encoding and perception.

Peripheral Encoding of Taste

At the level of the taste buds, electrophysiological recordings have revealed that taste receptor cells exhibit diverse electrical responses to different stimuli. This diversity forms the basis of two primary models of taste encoding: the labeled-line model and the across-fiber pattern model.

Labeled-Line Model

In the labeled-line model, specific taste receptor cells and their associated afferent fibers are dedicated to detecting and encoding single taste modalities, such as sweet, sour, or bitter. Patch-clamp studies of taste cells have shown that subsets of cells express receptors tuned to specific modalities, such as T1R2/T1R3 for sweet or T2Rs for bitter [1]. Electrophysiological recordings of gustatory nerves demonstrate that some fibers respond predominantly to a single taste quality, supporting this model [5].

Across-Fiber Pattern Model

Conversely, the across-fiber pattern model suggests that individual taste cells and afferent fibers respond to multiple taste modalities, and taste quality is encoded by the collective activity patterns across many fibers. MEA studies have shown that gustatory neurons can respond to combinations of sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami stimuli, with varying levels of sensitivity. These findings highlight the complexity of taste encoding and suggest that the brain integrates signals from multiple cells and fibers to decode taste quality [14].

Temporal Dynamics in Taste Buds

Electrophysiological studies also indicate that the temporal patterns of action potentials play a role in encoding taste intensity and quality. For instance, cells responding to bitter compounds often exhibit rapid adaptation, while those detecting sweet or umami compounds maintain sustained firing. These temporal dynamics suggest that taste perception is not only spatially but also temporally encoded [13].

Central Processing of Taste Signals

Electrophysiological recordings from central gustatory neurons in the brainstem and cortex have provided critical insights into how taste signals are processed and integrated.

Neurons in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract

The nucleus of the solitary tract (NST), located in the brainstem, is the first central relay for taste signals. Electrophysiological recordings from NST neurons have shown that they receive input from multiple taste receptor cells and display response profiles ranging from narrowly tuned (responsive to one modality) to broadly tuned (responsive to multiple modalities) [23]. The integration of signals at this level contributes to the modulation of taste perception based on context, such as hunger or satiety.

Cortical Representation of Taste

Taste signals are further relayed to the gustatory cortex, where electrophysiological studies have shown that neurons exhibit modality-specific responses as well as interactions between taste and other sensory modalities, such as smell and texture. For instance, cortical neurons responding to sweet stimuli may also be influenced by olfactory inputs, contributing to the perception of flavor. This multisensory integration is essential for the hedonic and cognitive aspects of taste perception [24].

Electrophysiology and Taste Modulation

Electrophysiological research has demonstrated that taste perception is modulated by internal states, such as hunger, satiety, and emotion.

Neuromodulation of Gustatory Responses

Studies have shown that neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine influence the activity of taste cells and central neurons. For example, serotonin release in the taste bud modulates presynaptic activity, enhancing the sensitivity to specific taste stimuli [20]. Similarly, dopamine plays a role in the reward-based aspects of taste perception [25].

Plasticity in Taste Perception

Electrophysiological studies have revealed that taste responses are subject to plasticity. For instance, changes in dietary salt intake can alter the sensitivity of salt-responsive neurons, a phenomenon that underscores the adaptability of the gustatory system [26].

Decoding Taste at the Population Level

Modern electrophysiological methods, such as multi-electrode arrays and optogenetics, have enabled population-level analyses of taste signaling. These approaches reveal that taste perception arises from the coordinated activity of large neuronal ensembles rather than individual cells. Optogenetic stimulation of specific populations of gustatory neurons has demonstrated that activating different subsets can elicit distinct taste perceptions, even in the absence of chemical stimuli [21].

Advances in Electrophysiological Techniques in Taste Research

Technological advances in electrophysiology have revolutionized taste research, enabling detailed exploration of the cellular, molecular, and systemic mechanisms underlying taste perception. From traditional single-cell recordings to cutting-edge optogenetics and computational modeling, these innovations have expanded our understanding of the taste system. This section discusses key technological advancements and their impact on taste electrophysiology research.

Modern Innovations in Electrophysiology

Optogenetics

Optogenetics has transformed taste research by enabling precise control of neuronal activity with light. By genetically targeting light-sensitive ion channels, such as channelrhodopsins, to specific taste cells, researchers can selectively activate or inhibit these cells in vivo [27]. This approach also allows for the study of neural circuit dynamics in the gustatory system with unprecedented precision.

Microfluidic Devices

Microfluidic devices allow for the precise delivery of tastants to individual taste cells or groups of cells in a controlled and reproducible manner. By utilizing microscale channels and chambers, these devices ensure accurate control over the concentration, timing, and flow rate of chemical stimuli. This level of precision is particularly valuable for studying taste mixture interactions, where complex tastant combinations can elicit suppression or enhancement effects. For example, microfluidic systems have been used to mimic natural oral environments and explore how specific taste components interact to produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This approach has uncovered mechanisms of taste suppression, such as how bitter compounds diminish sweet taste responses, providing insights that are critical for food and beverage formulation [28].
Additionally, microfluidic devices facilitate highthroughput screening of tastants, enabling researchers to efficiently study the effects of various chemical compounds on taste receptor activity. This capability is essential for identifying novel taste modulators and understanding individual differences in taste perception due to genetic variability.

Electrode Arrays

Electrode arrays, including MEAs and nanoelectrode arrays, enhance the sensitivity and scalability of electrophysiological recordings in taste research. MEAs allow for simultaneous measurement of electrical activity across multiple taste cells or nerve fibers, providing insights into population-level dynamics and the integration of signals within taste buds. This technology has been pivotal in exploring how different taste modalities are encoded and transmitted to the brain. For instance, MEAs have demonstrated that gustatory nerves exhibit overlapping responses to various tastants, supporting the across-fiber pattern model of taste coding [18].
Nanoelectrode arrays extend this capability by offering ultra-sensitive recordings at the single-cell or subcellular level. These arrays are particularly useful for studying ionic currents in taste cells, which are often too small to detect using traditional techniques. By resolving subtle changes in ion flow, nanoelectrode arrays have provided detailed insights into the activity of ion channels such as ENaCs for salty taste and proton-sensitive channels for sour taste [4].

Integration of Electrophysiology with Other Techniques

Electrophysiology and Genomics

The integration of electrophysiology with genomic techniques has enabled the study of taste receptor function in genetically modified animals. For example, knockout models lacking specific taste receptors (e.g., T1R or T2R receptors) have been used in combination with electrophysiological recordings to confirm the roles of these receptors in sweet and umami taste [29].

Neuroimaging and Electrophysiology

The combination of electrophysiological techniques with functional neuroimaging methods, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography, has allowed for the correlation of electrical activity with brain region activation. These studies have advanced our understanding of the cortical representation of taste and its interaction with other sensory modalities, such as smell and touch [30].

Future Directions

As electrophysiological techniques continue to evolve, several exciting directions emerge for taste research:
  • 1. Development of In Vivo Recording Systems: Advancements in miniaturized and wireless electrophysiological devices will enable long-term, real-time recordings of taste responses in freely moving animals. These systems could provide insights into how taste perception is influenced by behavioral context and physiological states, such as hunger or satiety.

  • 2. Single-Cell Electrophysiology in Organ-on-a-Chip Models: Combining electrophysiology with organ-on-a-chip technologies could allow for the study of human taste cells in controlled environments, bridging the gap between animal models and human physiology.

  • 3. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze electrophysiological data could uncover novel patterns and relationships in taste coding. These tools could also aid in the development of predictive models for taste responses to novel tastants.

Conclusion

Electrophysiological research has significantly advanced our understanding of taste transduction, providing detailed insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie taste perception. From the identification of specific receptors for different taste modalities to the characterization of neural circuits that process gustatory information, these studies have illuminated key aspects of how taste is encoded and perceived. The integration of electrophysiology with advanced imaging, optogenetics, and computational modeling has further expanded our ability to study the gustatory system with unprecedented precision.
High-resolution, real-time recordings from freely behaving animals could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how taste perception is influenced by context and internal states. Similarly, human-relevant models, such as taste organoids combined with electrophysiological techniques, hold promise for bridging the gap between animal studies and human physiology.
Another exciting frontier lies in the integration of multisensory research, examining how taste interacts with other modalities like smell and texture to create the perception of flavor. Understanding these interactions at the neural and molecular levels could have profound implications for food science, health, and medicine.
In summary, while significant progress has been made in the field of taste electrophysiology, ongoing advancements in technology and interdisciplinary approaches promise to unravel the remaining mysteries of taste perception, ultimately enhancing our understanding of this fundamental sensory system.

Notes

Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Data Availavility
None.

References

1. Chandrashekar J, Hoon MA, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS. The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 2006 444:288-94.
crossref pmid pdf
2. Liman ER, Zhang YV, Montell C. Peripheral coding of taste. Neuron 2014 81:984-1000.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Roper SD, Chaudhari N. Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017 18:485-97.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Tu YH, Cooper AJ, Teng B, Chang RB, Artiga DJ, Turner HN, et al. An evolutionarily conserved gene family encodes proton-selective ion channels. Science 2018 359:1047-50.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Yarmolinsky DA, Zuker CS, Ryba NJ. Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects. Cell 2009 139:234-44.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Margolskee RF. Molecular mechanisms of bitter and sweet taste transduction. J Biol Chem 2002 277:1-4.
crossref pmid
7. Roper SD. Signal transduction and information processing in mammalian taste buds. Pflugers Arch 2007 454(5):759-76 doi:10.1007/s00424-007-0247-x.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Li X, Staszewski L, Xu H, Durick K, Zoller M, Adler E. Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99:4692-6.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Zhang Y, Hoon MA, Chandrashekar J, Mueller KL, Cook B, Wu D, et al. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell 2003 112:293-301.
crossref pmid
10. Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C, Brockhoff A, Chudoba E, Bufe B, et al. The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses 2010 35:157-70.
crossref pmid
11. Heck GL, Mierson S, DeSimone JA. Salt taste transduction occurs through an amiloride-sensitive sodium transport pathway. Science 1984 223:403-5.
crossref pmid
12. Bushman JD, Ye W, Liman ER. A proton current associated with sour taste: distribution and functional properties. Faseb J 2015 29:3014-26.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Roper SD. Taste buds as peripheral chemosensory processors. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2013 24:71-9.
crossref pmid
14. Carleton A, Accolla R, Simon SA. Coding in the mammalian gustatory system. Trends Neurosci 2010 33:326-34.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Sato K, Tanaka K, Touhara K. Sugar-regulated cation channel formed by an insect gustatory receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011 108:11680-5.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Medler KF, Margolskee RF, Kinnamon SC. Electrophysiological characterization of voltage-gated currents in defined taste cell types of mice. J Neurosci 2003 23:2608-17.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Ohtubo Y, Suemitsu T, Shiobara S, Matsumoto T, Kumazawa T, Yoshii KY. Optical recordings of taste responses from fungiform papillae of mouse in situ. J Physiol 2001 53:287-93.
crossref pdf
18. Liu S, Zhu P, Tian Y, Chen Y, Liu Y, Wang M, et al. A taste bud organoid-based microelectrode array biosensor for taste sensing. Chemosensors 2022 10:208.
crossref
19. Finger TE, Danilova V, Barrows J, Bartel DL, Vigers AJ, Stone L, et al. ATP signaling is crucial for communication from taste buds to gustatory nerves. Science 2005 310:1495-9.
crossref pmid
20. Huang YA, Maruyama Y, Stimac R, Roper SD. Presynaptic (Type III) cells in mouse taste buds sense sour (acid) taste. J Physiol 2008 586:2903-12.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Chen X, Gabitto M, Peng Y, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS. A gustotopic map of taste qualities in the mammalian brain. Science 2011 333:1262-6.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Breslin PA, Spector AC. Mammalian taste perception. Curr Biol 2008 18:R148-55.
crossref pmid
23. Young Kyung C. The centrifugal influence on gustatory neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract. IJOB 2015 40:161-6.
crossref
24. Rolls ET. Taste, olfactory, and food texture processing in the brain, and the control of food intake. Physiol Behav 2005 85:45-56.
crossref pmid
25. Wise RA. Role of brain dopamine in food reward and reinforcement. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006 361:1149-58.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Contreras RJ, Frank M. Sodium deprivation alters neural responses to gustatory stimuli. J Gen Physiol 1979 73:569-94.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Snell NJ, Fisher JD, Hartmann GG, Zolyomi B, Talay M, Barnea G. Complex representation of taste quality by second-order gustatory neurons in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2022 32:3758-72.e4.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Han J, Choi M. Comprehensive functional screening of taste sensation in vivo. BioRxiv 2018 371682.
crossref
29. Kalyanasundar B, Blonde GD, Spector AC, Travers SP. Electrophysiological responses to sugars and amino acids in the nucleus of the solitary tract of type 1 taste receptor double-knockout mice. J Neurophysiol 2020 123:843-59.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Olofsson JK, Freiherr J. Chapter 17 - Neuroimaging of smell and taste. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of clinical neurology. 164th ed. Elsevier; 2019. p.263-82.

Figure 1.
Taste receptors for five basic taste transduction pathways. GPCR, g-protein-coupled receptors; PKA, protein kinase A; PLC, phospholipase C.
jnn-2024-4-2-117f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Electrophysiological approaches for taste transduction.
jnn-2024-4-2-117f2.jpg
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 265 View
  • 14 Download
ORCID iDs

Hyun Seok Ryu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-5501

Related articles


Editorial Office
Dankook University Hospital, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
Tel: +82-41-529-6050   Fax: +82-41-559-7838   E-mail: jnn.kinmos@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Intraoperative Neural Monitoring Society.

Developed in M2PI